#1
|
|||
|
|||
limited and non limited hold them: a comparative analysis
limit hold 'em, the [censored] trabant of poker:
(graph 90% 2/4) bold and aggressive play is only rewarded with getting covered in poo. this is sub-optimal. unlimited hold 'em, the cadillac of poker: (2/3 nl50, 1/3 nl100) bold and aggressive play is rewarded with american dollars. most experts consider that to be superior to poo. conclusion: if you play limited hold 'em, you support terrorism. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: limited and non limited hold them: a comparative analysis
Sorry but Im an expert and poo is FAR superior to dollars.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: limited and non limited hold them: a comparative analysis
Cliffnotes: OP sux at LHE.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: limited and non limited hold them: a comparative analysis
after 5,500 hands of NL you were break even too... play more limit obv
|
|
|