Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:20 PM
hamnegger hamnegger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,986
Default 88 vs a few limpers

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (9 handed) internettexasholdem.com

SB (t19945)
BB (t12112)
UTG (t17850)
UTG+1 (t5665)
MP1 (t9549)
MP2 (t5160)
Hero (t7455)
CO (t7465)
Button (t15625)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls t400, UTG+1 calls t400, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls t400, <font color="#CC3333">Hero ?


if i raise how much? if i call do i shove raises behind me?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:31 PM
markbris markbris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: attempting to pwn the mids
Posts: 708
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

Looks like a good place to shove to me. By my calculations you are picking up over 2000 chips with the limpers plus blinds and antes, thats over 25% of your stack, well worth going for so I would just push. The only thing that might change this is if one of the limpers is really tight and might be limping a monster or something but i doubt it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:31 PM
bambam16 bambam16 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

I think stack sizes are a little awkward for a raise that serves a purpose here. If I didn't look at your stack I would say raise to 2500-2800 but then that puts over 1/3 of your stack in the middle.

Let's look at the people who limped before you:
UTG: huge stack at the table. Should (ideally) be abusing some of the smaller stacks and raising. His limp tells me he's weak.
UTG+1: Shorter stack. His limp looks like a hand with high implied odds but something he'd be willing to fold to a raise. If you raise the suggested amount above and he pushes you have to call with anything.
MP2: Even shorter stack. I can't think he has any hand that beats you right now, otherwise he would have raised.

Given the stacks on the button and SB, I would think one of them would put in a hefty raise to pick up dead money here. If you raise you are pretty much committed to the hand if someone else forces you all in. So I think I call and play for set value here. The raise size I suggest would put me in an awkward spot if someone pushes, and I don't know that I want to call off with 88.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:34 PM
supair supair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England, UK
Posts: 299
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

jus shove ham, theres what, a quarter of your stack in the pot, your m = just over 10, its making moves time, your probably best and you have FE.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:52 PM
bambam16 bambam16 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

The reason I don't shove here is because it pretty much turns our hand face up, does it not?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-19-2007, 10:02 PM
AC-Cobra AC-Cobra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 284
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

[ QUOTE ]
The reason I don't shove here is because it pretty much turns our hand face up, does it not?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree but calling for set value with not great a stack is a little spewy as well (especially with people still to act). I think shoving is the lesser of two evils.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-19-2007, 10:04 PM
supair supair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England, UK
Posts: 299
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

[ QUOTE ]
The reason I don't shove here is because it pretty much turns our hand face up, does it not?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really, Im shoving most hands Id raise with here except AA/KK/QQ, and occasionally Im shoving QQ here too. And even if our hand WAS face up, how often does anyone have 99+ here? If they want to race for all/most of their chips here, lets race.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-19-2007, 10:06 PM
markbris markbris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: attempting to pwn the mids
Posts: 708
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The reason I don't shove here is because it pretty much turns our hand face up, does it not?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really, Im shoving most hands Id raise with here except AA/KK/QQ, and occasionally Im shoving QQ here too. And even if our hand WAS face up, how often does anyone have 99+ here? If they want to race for all/most of their chips here, lets race.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:49 PM
donquay donquay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 222
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

it's either limp or shove it...I'd limp/play for set value only if I had a read that utg likes to limp a monster with aggro players behind (or something along those lines)

I'd prefer to jam because the money in the pot already looks too juicy and if someone calls, I don't mind a race (hopefully instead of an overpair)...do 99/TT overlimp in ep?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-20-2007, 11:20 AM
BarryLyndon BarryLyndon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,590
Default Re: 88 vs a few limpers

Dude, you have 88 in the BB in a limp happy SSMT with a pot that's like more than 25% of your stack. Hit that push button, get called by KJo or 77, lose, and go play some x-box.

Barry
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.