Assani's NFL Wagering Thread

[NajdorfDefense]

[ QUOTE ]
I post this same thread over at footballguys, and this post by kensat30 has convinced me to lay off the SF/Pit game I think: Let me preface by saying that I am a Niner homer.

Normally I would agree with you that Pittsburgh is a lock to blowout the Niner's in Pittsburgh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pls don't repost threads/ideas/posts like these in this forum. This belongs in sporting events, and no one cares about some random poster from some random site anyway. Thanks.

[21times20]

is najdorf like a mod or something?

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
is najdorf like a mod or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, he runs [censored]. Like trying to keep the moran infestation in check.

This thread is awful. Some of the analysis is gibberish. There is no discussion of methodology or why any of the analysis makes sense. Like he doesn't "connect the dots" in any sort of meaningful way. His thread last year was a gross perversion of stupidity into an FGators level of moranism. Aside from lying about his record and his bets etc etc. we mostly just don't like the ignorant pompous attitude Assani takes.

[NajdorfDefense]

Stop sucking up to me like I'm a mod or something.

Srsly, we got enuff gibberish on this forum, we don't need to [censored] import it from elsewhere by a guy who was making '100-unit bets' last year, and misreporting his record then, and saying how he's undefeated ldo and etc.

If he wins our bet then gg AF, but reposting nonsense is totally unnecessary. Isn't one I HAS LOCKXS thread enough, we have to put that stupidity in every thread now?

Suggestion: every time someone seriously says XYZ is 'a lock, a guarantee, can't lose' make them offer 10-1 odds to everyone on the forum up to $100. If XYZ is already > 10-1, then make it 100-1 odds. If they back out, temp ban for a week. If they come back and post 'locks' again, permaban.
If they post someone else's 'locks' same thing.

Sugg 2: All 'locks' from now on must go in I HAS LOCKS thread, otherwise temp ban, 2nd offense perma ban.

[Post-Oak]

[ QUOTE ]
Stop sucking up to me like I'm a mod or something.

Srsly, we got enuff gibberish on this forum, we don't need to [censored] import it from elsewhere by a guy who was making '100-unit bets' last year, and misreporting his record then, and saying how he's undefeated ldo and etc.

If he wins our bet then gg AF, but reposting nonsense is totally unnecessary. Isn't one I HAS LOCKXS thread enough, we have to put that stupidity in every thread now?

Suggestion: every time someone seriously says XYZ is 'a lock, a guarantee, can't lose' make them offer 10-1 odds to everyone on the forum up to $100. If XYZ is already > 10-1, then make it 100-1 odds. If they back out, temp ban for a week. If they come back and post 'locks' again, permaban.
If they post someone else's 'locks' same thing.

Sugg 2: All 'locks' from now on must go in I HAS LOCKS thread, otherwise temp ban, 2nd offense perma ban.

[/ QUOTE ]

Those are some great ideas. Thanks for looking out for the forum, especially against "outsiders".

What do you suggest we do to people who lie about their W/L record or units won? You know, like you have done in the NCAA Football threads, and like you have done for years. Should we ban them, like you were banned form that other forum?

[Assani Fisher]

[ QUOTE ]

What do you suggest we do to people who lie about their W/L record or units won? You know, like you have done in the NCAA Football threads, and like you have done for years. Should we ban them, like you were banned form that other forum?

[/ QUOTE ]

What exactly is the story here? I'm intruiged, especially since he so often tries to play board cop and/or put down others in this forum.

[Post-Oak]

Post deleted by Performify

[NajdorfDefense]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

What do you suggest we do to people ...like you were banned form that other forum?

[/ QUOTE ]
What exactly is the story here?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the moderator from the other place who banned me, I had a problem with his lies about his record among other things, and the biggest 'post-game' picker and hack of all is their leader.

Here's a direct quote from his posts on a [very famous] game earlier this year:

"Yesterday, 10:34 PM
College Bowl Season: Week 3 (beginning 1/1/07)
Views: 8,157
Posted By S....
this is called the idiot tax. turned a great day...

this is called the idiot tax. turned a great day into a pile of [censored].
buying back as much as i can.
results as follows:
Okla wins: push
boise wins: lose a pentuple [5 units]

Today, 12:25 AM
Replies: 273
College Bowl Season: Week 3 (beginning 1/1/07)
Views: 8,157
Posted By S...
Boise pk (double)
Boise pk (double)
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i ended up hedging this...
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i ended up hedging this to break even if boise state won"


4 hours after the game starts, and after that crazy finish, instead of 5u loss it's magically breakeven.
Somehow didn't post during OT for some reason...I wonder why....not like that game ended...he didn't post after Okla tied the game...

or after Okla took the lead in regulation...

or after Okla took the lead in OT...

or when Boise had to convert on 4th down...

or before Boise went for 2 pts...isn't that odd? This is the guy who banned me, LOLOL. Yeah, he's trustworthy.

I will happily call out any poster who posts his record continually using no-vig lines, and lines never available. Others have mentioned that they feel similarly.
I disagree with mt2r, various horse and cbb-cappers, and data miners, and people who guarantee picks.

If you don't like me commenting on it, stop doing it, and/or also go to wagerline and post all your picks there, link to it, and then we can ALL go and admire your perspicacity in January.
Fair? If that's too much to ask, you can always put me on ignore, it's your option entirely.

FTR, posters who don't like criticism, and then heavily criticize my posts, should look up 'hypocrite' in the dictionary. If they know how to use a dictionary.

[21times20]

lol at your phrase prejudice, i don't see anything in the post you quoted that remotely resembles a claim of a bet being a lock, at least not in the eyes of someone with the slightest bit of reading comprehension

[NajdorfDefense]

your 7th and 8th posts here have been tremendous, looking fwd to you continuing to add value to the board!

Or something.