#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
come on brian
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
"I have such a lousy vantage point here that I can't get the action on any hand until it becomes so important that I hover over the table. So I get the end part. But on this hand, DOUBLE the biggest in the Million Dollar Cash Game, it wasn't about strategy. It was about balls."
http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/poker-blog/...es_infinity.php |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
[ QUOTE ]
It wasn't about strategy. It was about balls." [/ QUOTE ] I have no idea what that is supposed to mean with regard to this hand. Whose balls is he talking about? |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
$775,000
that's a nice pot. Seeing Ivey, Patrik and Brian going at it should be a nice contrast to what we're seeing on HSP at the moment. Not that HSP isn't entertaining. It certainly is but this has all the makings of something more interesting. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
Never heard of anyone running it 4 times when all in til that PA interview.
Ivey calling out Lindgren for having a dirty house was pretty good. Is this going to be televised? I would pay money to see that exchange between Brian and Tony G. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
I wonder what Patrik had, I think AK would do it.
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder what Patrik had, I think AK would do it. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, he though he'd at worst be chopping. They psych is crazy here... PI 3 barrels, much like PA did, but with a more solid holding at the flop and doesn't check for pot control on a scary river. PA had to put him on AK or less. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Michael Craig seems results orientated and pretty clueless about poker theory in his blog. He thinks one of the reasons it's good to check the nuts is because it keeps the pot small when your opponent, who is drawing live, hits. Obviously pot control is a good thing when you have the nuts. [/ QUOTE ] If you are talking about the Howard/Allen hand, I think you miss his point. Howard intended to check-raise the turn because it was clear Allen had a set (Howard held the nut straight) and planned on a huge check-raise. Instead, according to Howard, Allen checked behind FOR VALUE because he can't call if Howard check-raises because Allen's hand is pretty much defined because he flat-called a RERAISE as the third player in. By checking, he both keeps the pot small with a vulnerable hand and gets value if the board pairs on the river because Howard will likely call a small bet. Andy Bloch breaks it down a little bit in his audio interview. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, yes, we all understand how the hand went down and why, but Craig definitely wrote it up very result-oriented, I noticed the same thing, he said that Howard played it the best he could because if he had bet on the turn and gotten called, he would have had to pay off a 40k river bet instead of a 10k one. That's results-oriented. Also seriously, why is every hand about "balls" and "dick-out"?? The latest post is about a monster pot where Ivey had JJ on an AAJ board and Antonius OBVIOUSLY had a big hand cause he called a huge river bet...how is that "about balls"?? Does Craig think that Antonius called him with king high or something? It's obvious Antonius had a good hand. In some other post he went on about how there were a couple of re-raising wars that apparently were also just about balls. Why does he think they weren't 2 guys with good hands reraising each other, why is it always balls? What is all this dick-out stuff earlier? I think Michael Craig is preoccupied with balls. All this "it's all about balls!" stuff, it's kind of hack writing, the kind of thing that sells mass-market paperbacks about poker, but I would really defy anyone to explain how the AAJ hand involves balls. Michael Craig, why is it always balls with you? (and occasionally dicks) |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
Oh also super awesome how he is bragging about the dead read he has on Patrik Antonius. He knew he had a big hand vs. Brian and knew he wasn't gonna raise vs. Ivey. Awesome, we've finally found the guy who has Antonius' number, someone stake him and get him in that game PRONTO.
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Live high stakes cash game with Sbrugby and FTP
all i can think about is antonius giving brian the "magnum" look just before making the huge call
|
|
|