|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl1k KQ against double c/r
nah, he'd betout to protect against a fd
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl1k KQ against double c/r
Why is there 2 Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]'s?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl1k KQ against double c/r
[ QUOTE ]
Why is there 2 Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]'s? [/ QUOTE ] Because I edited the HH by hand and screwed up [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Doesn't really mater though, replace it with any non-spade. Is villains line a good line with a very strong hand then? Since we're calling off with just about anything? I think people fire a turn a lot if it goes check, bet, raise, call on flop and then check again. The player IP is pretty likely to bet out with a lot of hands here since the other player sort of announces that he's giving up? In Heroes shoes with AQ, how often do you fire turn again as opposed to checking? What about with KK and AA? What hands are you more likely to bet out with, and what type of hands do you typically want to check behind this turn? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl1k KQ against double c/r
KK+ I would bet-call on the turn.
AQ sometimes. The rest check behind; if he hits his 9-outer gg. |
|
|