Party vs. FTP - is PP really softer taking rakeback into account?

[orig!naL]

I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but I am asking this question in regards to small stakes NL (100NL-200NL).

First of all, I play on FTP, however I do have the option to play on PP, living in Canada.

To those who play on PP and have played on FTP in the past: I constantly hear how soft Party is. In your opinion, taking FTP's 27% rakeback into account, is it so soft on PP that it makes it more profitable to play there?

Essentially, what is better: The soft "factor" of PP or FTP + Rakeback.

(In regards to 100NL and 200NL - any additional opinions up to 400NL would be great as well)

Thanks.

[Logun]

I've been told many times over to get some money over to PP. However I'm lazy and RB is easy.

I'll try it out and let you know.

[ajmargarine]

Yes, No, go find out yourself.