#111
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
So does that mean this whole thread is a level?
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
[ QUOTE ] So does that mean this whole thread is a level? [/ QUOTE ] I guess that depends on your definition of "level" RIIT |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
New email i just received from WPEX:
"WSEX Poker would like to announce that we now have full hand histories to hard drives available for all levels and types of games. We pay back 75% of the rake every Monday, no minimum play required. There are three $5,000 added Tournaments per week with a $10 entry fee. Of course we still offer our "Aces Never Lose" promotion four nights a week. Play poker at WSEX and find out how much you are throwing away in rake anywhere else. www.worldpx.com" wonder if they will change the table types? |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
Yet the red non-HH tables are still there. I don't know how to interpret this e-mail. Was it that previously some levels ONLY had non-HH tables, so that now they have added green HH tables to those levels? If this is so, I hadn't noticed, and really not much has changed.
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
Yes, the non-HH tables are still there.
The email says that we have full HH tablles available at all levels (All dollar amounts) and all types (Limit and NL). It doesn't say we are eliminating the non-HH tables. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Fred |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, the non-HH tables are still there. The email says that we have full HH tablles available at all levels (All dollar amounts) and all types (Limit and NL). It doesn't say we are eliminating the non-HH tables. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Fred [/ QUOTE ] Fred, Is it possible for you to post some stats about the demand levels you're seeing for the HH tables vs. the non-HH tables? RIIT |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
[ QUOTE ]
Fred, Is it possible for you to post some stats about the demand levels you're seeing for the HH tables vs. the non-HH tables? RIIT [/ QUOTE ] Don't hold your breath |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Fred, Is it possible for you to post some stats about the demand levels you're seeing for the HH tables vs. the non-HH tables? RIIT [/ QUOTE ] Don't hold your breath [/ QUOTE ] He will respond or he won't respond. Either way we learn something by simply asking. RIIT |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
I just sampled September 6th to the 13th. About 64% of the hands were with full hand histories, 36% with no hand histories.
No word on Epassporte yet. Traffic is definitely coming up this past week, particularly in the evenings. Fred |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Congratulations WPEX on dumbest improvement ever
[ QUOTE ]
I just sampled September 6th to the 13th. About 64% of the hands were with full hand histories, 36% with no hand histories. No word on Epassporte yet. Traffic is definitely coming up this past week, particularly in the evenings. Fred [/ QUOTE ] Fred, You rock! Is it possible to know the average number of players per hand for each? The reason I ask has to do with the actual player demand in the case where the average number of players per hand is dramatically different - e.g. all of the HH tables were 2 or 3 players but all of the HH'less tables were 9 or 10 players (or vice versa). If the averages are the same then your figures suggest that 2 in 3 players on WPX prefer HH tables and 1 in 3 prefer HH'less tables. RIIT |
|
|