Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-10-2007, 04:45 PM
Veron Veron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Holland
Posts: 590
Default Re: 2/4 TT

I prefer a call preflop and as played I fold.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-10-2007, 05:01 PM
David1234 David1234 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Getting blinded away
Posts: 1,356
Default Re: 2/4 TT

meh, why do you bet if u are unsure what you will do if he raises
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-10-2007, 05:19 PM
Renton Renton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: 2/4 TT

who says i was unsure? I knew what i was gonna do, i just want to know if what i knew was right.

Everyone is dodging the question, which is "is it plus ev to get it in here?"

Obviously theres no way i can check the flop.

From his perspective, he can't really profitably c/c <99, because a good player with position is going to apply pressure and he's never gonna get to showdown. Also I'm fairly sure that a) he calls preflop with a lot of 22-99, considering that he's probably sick of being 3bet and b) he 4bets me preflop with QQ+ a fair amount since he already did it once before, and since he's out of position.

FWIW i i'd autoshove JJ here.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-10-2007, 08:10 PM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 20,529
Default Re: 2/4 TT

QQ/JJ are hands that would take this line pretty often but there are certain players that will do this with smaller pairs cuz they don't know what else to do with them, or AK type of hands cuz they think they will pick up the pot somewhat often and have outs when they don't.

and as for it being the sixth best starting hand, it kinda sucks to take the sixth best starting hand and playing it in such a fashion that you aren't favored over your opponent's range once he puts in more than 4% of his stack. So, unless you think he's giving action with too big of a range vs your threebets and you're happy getting it in, just call and get value postflop. To me, it just makes no sense at all to even have a decision to consider here. That's part of the preflop decision process.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:09 PM
DaDizz DaDizz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 329
Default Re: 2/4 TT

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like threebetting pairs that you don't want to felt unless it's to bluff out some bigger ones (which isn't a good plan with TT)

[/ QUOTE ]

it's all about seeing where your at/pushing small edges

for the hand, fold vs villain
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:30 PM
JackAll JackAll is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: watching 2+2 get crapier daily
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: 2/4 TT

soah said:
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like threebetting pairs that you don't want to felt unless it's to bluff out some bigger ones (which isn't a good plan with TT)

[/ QUOTE ]

This has been a dilemma of mine for a while. Does this mean you felt it, or do you flat call pf against someone who hasn't been playing back at you here with 99/TT?

Everyone always says to 3-bet here in position with TT, tho maybe it's when we are in position and they are CO (with a wider range). But even then, going by your point, it doesn't change things.

soah said:
[ QUOTE ]
QQ/JJ are hands that would take this line pretty often but there are certain players that will do this with smaller pairs cuz they don't know what else to do with them, or AK type of hands cuz they think they will pick up the pot somewhat often and have outs when they don't.

and as for it being the sixth best starting hand, it kinda sucks to take the sixth best starting hand and playing it in such a fashion that you aren't favored over your opponent's range once he puts in more than 4% of his stack. So, unless you think he's giving action with too big of a range vs your threebets and you're happy getting it in, just call and get value postflop. To me, it just makes no sense at all to even have a decision to consider here. That's part of the preflop decision process.

[/ QUOTE ]

This has been my thought exactly. But everyone says to 3-b pre (tho most posters suck pretty badly I admit)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:37 PM
DrMagic DrMagic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 645
Default Re: 2/4 TT

wtf who is telling you to 3bet pre with TT here? calling a single raise pf with TT is pretty standard
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:44 PM
JEFF or DAD JEFF or DAD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 699
Default Re: 2/4 TT

[ QUOTE ]
soah said:
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like threebetting pairs that you don't want to felt unless it's to bluff out some bigger ones (which isn't a good plan with TT)

[/ QUOTE ]

This has been a dilemma of mine for a while. Does this mean you felt it, or do you flat call pf against someone who hasn't been playing back at you here with 99/TT?

Everyone always says to 3-bet here in position with TT, tho maybe it's when we are in position and they are CO (with a wider range). But even then, going by your point, it doesn't change things.

soah said:
[ QUOTE ]
QQ/JJ are hands that would take this line pretty often but there are certain players that will do this with smaller pairs cuz they don't know what else to do with them, or AK type of hands cuz they think they will pick up the pot somewhat often and have outs when they don't.

and as for it being the sixth best starting hand, it kinda sucks to take the sixth best starting hand and playing it in such a fashion that you aren't favored over your opponent's range once he puts in more than 4% of his stack. So, unless you think he's giving action with too big of a range vs your threebets and you're happy getting it in, just call and get value postflop. To me, it just makes no sense at all to even have a decision to consider here. That's part of the preflop decision process.

[/ QUOTE ]

This has been my thought exactly. But everyone says to 3-b pre (tho most posters suck pretty badly I admit)

[/ QUOTE ]

you suck pretty badly if you think everyone is saying to 3-bet pre here
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:50 PM
soah soah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 20,529
Default Re: 2/4 TT

wait a minute

TT is the 5th best starting hand, not the 6th best

not that it matters, I'm just mad that I didn't catch that sooner =P
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:10 AM
JackAll JackAll is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: watching 2+2 get crapier daily
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: 2/4 TT

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But everyone says to 3-b pre (tho most posters suck pretty badly I admit)

[/ QUOTE ]

you suck pretty badly if you think everyone is saying to 3-bet pre here

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah maybe it was SSNL. I just moved up to 400nl last month and started reading MSNL.

But most of the posts I've read (wherever it was) say to 3-b TT in position from what I remember.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.