TT in the SB (shorthanded) - Page 4

KitCloudkicker · #31 09-10-2007, 02:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
(crying) call with 55 A4s 9xs etc

[/ QUOTE ]

these are all good calls against most opponents. not crying calls.

larm · #32 09-10-2007, 02:08 PM

Yes but it depends on what Fadook is 3 barelling with!

Buzz-cp · #33 09-10-2007, 02:30 PM

I think I will bet river again. He may call down w/A-hi.

tyler_cracker · #34 09-10-2007, 03:24 PM

i vote for b/c.

c/r is interesting but too tricky for my taste without a better read. edit for eskimo: i agree that a river 3bet is rare, but can you really fold to it? can you really call it?

i don't like b/f here. to lossely paraphrase babar, "don't b/f the river against TAGs. especially at fishmax."

as for c/c, aaron said it best (as usual):

[ QUOTE ]
When in doubt, value bet > inducing bluffs.

[/ QUOTE ]

kit,

this is gonna sound weird coming from me but i think your reply to sykes is a little out of line -- maybe you do, in fact, smoke crack so that set you off?

KitCloudkicker · #35 09-10-2007, 03:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]

kit,

this is gonna sound weird coming from me but i think your reply to sykes is a little out of line -- maybe you do, in fact, smoke crack so that set you off?

[/ QUOTE ]

its monday [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Buzz-cp · #36 09-10-2007, 03:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i don't like b/f here. to lossely paraphrase babar, "don't b/f the river against TAGs. especially at fishmax especiallecially in a blind war."

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

bravos1 · #37 09-10-2007, 07:08 PM

I usually just fire here, but a c/r is sexy [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] (but prolly to expensive)

Fantam · #38 09-10-2007, 07:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
edit for eskimo

[/ QUOTE ]

Is Eskimo still posting here, or posting under another name now ? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Whatever, I look forward to some more Eskimo posts. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Rev. Good Will · #39 09-10-2007, 08:49 PM

guys who think villain won't call with A hi:

play more shorthanded, from villain's perspective this is almost a textbook calldown on this board.

bennyhana · #40 09-10-2007, 10:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
bet. flush draw yes, but he is just as likely to showdown UI overs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is a TAG really going to call with KQ, AQ, or AK against a preflop 3-bettor?

[/ QUOTE ]

just because their preflop stats look like they are good, doesn't mean they are good postflop. I've seen a ton of short handed players with tightish stats make some of the most disgusting plays postflop. I just sit there thinking, dude, if you're only going to play that many hands, at least play them well. LOL

After reading this thread, I still vote for value bet, and I'm probably calling a raise, depending on his showdown numbers and what I think of his big street play.