#1
|
|||
|
|||
San Fran -3
Anyone know of a 2.5? What do you guys think of this? They seem a little overhyped, but it is against the Cardinals.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran +3
You are aware that the line is SF -3 correct?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran +3
[ QUOTE ]
You are aware that the line is SF -3 correct? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah...my mistake. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran +3
All the books in vegas have it at -3 (-120). I doubt you'll be able to find 2.5. More likely to move to 3.5, I think. I'll take SF.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran -3
I think that I'm ditching on betting the Ravens and just putting money on SF? Anyone think SF is a bad bet?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran -3
got all my moniez on SF...gogogoggo
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran -3
I'm not betting the spread here, but I do have 2u to win 2.06u on the under 45.5. Should have waited I guess as it's up to (+106) now and will probably only get better as we move closer to kickoff.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran -3
I like Leinart to play well and have a big game. So, I have Arizona at +3. SF was ranked 26th on offense and defense last season, and their strength of schedule ranked 26th.
The only problem I have with AZ is their defense, but I think they can outscore SF and win the game. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran -3
sia has the total listed now at 47.5
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Fran -3
Bah, guess I need to get an account there too. I figured that Bookmaker for the early lines and Matchbook for the late lines was enough, but I don't really have a super-square book to cover stuff like MNF totals.
Is there really that big of a difference between under 47.5(-110) and under 45.5(+108) though? |
|
|