|
View Poll Results: Should I update the Miss POG contest in BBV daily? | |||
Yes | 20 | 68.97% | |
No | 9 | 31.03% | |
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
if you define " 2p2ers" as anyone with an internet connection, I would estimate that close to 100% of online winners are 2p2ers. [/ QUOTE ] but then again, if by "2p2ers" he means anyone who owns a horse with its penis on its forehead, I'm guessing it would be around 0% |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
8% max
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
if you changed 'online winners' to 'online winners at 200NL and above (and equivalent for other formats)', or 'online winners that make 5 figures or more a year', then it has to be at least 80%.
if you are including people that play once a fortnight and are small winners at low limits, or live players, then who knows |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
i know how we can settle this
pole time |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
if you changed 'online winners' to 'online winners at 200NL and above (and equivalent for other formats)', or 'online winners that make 5 figures or more a year', then it has to be at least 80%. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a bit too generous. If you tighten restrictions a bit i bet you could get it near 80%, using your definition I would guess 60-70%. Also I bet if you took the lifetime winnings/winrate of people in this thread with high guesses, and compared it to those who made low guesses, the highs would be ahead. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm assuming you're including lurkers, if you only mean posters then it's impossible to say. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, wouldn't the opposite be true? It's impossible to tell how many lurkers are winners, but we would have a better chance of figuring out how many posters are winners. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
25% max.
so many good foreign players who don't know about 2+2. So many uNL players who are winners but post on other forums, or not at all. I'd say winning mid/high players (NL1000+) prolly 30% under that prolly 10% max. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: % of on-line winners that are 2+2?
I play PLO8 on Stars and FTP, formerly played it on Party Poker too. For micro through highstakes, i'd say 10-20% max of winning O8 players are on 2+2. Number of lurkers is much higher though.
The player pool in online O8 is too small, so most players have no interest in talking strategy. |
|
|