![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1.) 14/12/3 NITTY TAG or multitabler
2.) 16/12/3.0 NITTY TAG or multitabler 3.) 18/16/3.0 TAG 4.) 20/18/3.0 TAG 5.) 22/20/2.5 Slightly LAGGY TAG 6.) 24/18/2.5 Slightly LAGGY TAG 7.) 25%+ LAGTAG FWIW these are all 2+2 type stats, but all of them seem more solid PF than most 2+2er's. If your tables are filled with players with these stats, you should find another table. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I 25%+ = LAG ?
I play 26/21/4.5 and consider myself rather TAG, on the edge of being LAG. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nit
Nit TAG TAG TAG TAG LAG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't really think this question is important. It's a scale
NIT - TAG - LAG. One can be a nittish TAG or a slightly loose TAG... But if you really have to categorise them, I would use what mookboi said. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I don't really think this question is important. It's a scale NIT - TAG - LAG. One can be a nittish TAG or a slightly loose TAG... But if you really have to categorise them, I would use what mookboi said. [/ QUOTE ] I am inquiring as to get an idea of what the general consensus of a TAG is. Since when people give reads or state what type of player they are, most like to think of themselves as TAG. Question wasnt strictly to categorize, but to get an idea of how others perceive the terms. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tag tag tag tag tag tag loosing up tag
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would you try to put them in a box, you only loose information that way.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Why would you try to put them in a box, you only loose information that way. [/ QUOTE ] This |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Why would you try to put them in a box, you only loose information that way. [/ QUOTE ] precisement |
![]() |
|
|