|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Did brock fuck Misty | |||
| lolz t0tally |
   
|
1 | 25.00% |
| wtf no she aint liek dat |
  
|
3 | 75.00% |
| Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
09-06-2007, 02:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Thread on the Foxnews Republican Debate
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] lol, paul is winning the text in vote. [/ QUOTE ] proof how meaningless those polls are [/ QUOTE ] What are the chances these txt polls could translate into an actual turn out for voting? And why is there no mention on Fox about the margin by which Ron Paul is winning "their poll"? [/ QUOTE ] There was. Hannity said it was frantic use of the redial button or something to that effect. [/ QUOTE ] I tried to call twice just to see if you could. I got a recording saying I had already voted. But don't let the facts interfere with Fox News. [/ QUOTE ] Which is easily circumvented by blocking your number. Just because RP is too backward to figure that out it doesnt mean all of his supporters are. Apparently it got past you though. [/ QUOTE ] Can we take this one step further and conclude all the supporters for candidates besides Ron Paul are too backwards to figure things out? Finally we agree. [/ QUOTE ] a more reasonable conclusion would be that they arent fanatics who think its fun to distort a poll, so no, we dont agree. [/ QUOTE ] I suspected that it might be a blocked number thing. But, if thats the case, why the hell would they take any votes from blocked numbers. Sure seems like an extremely easy thing to fix. [/ QUOTE ] To not limit the total number of votes, since so many people block their cell phones. That may change after tonite though. A small count is better than a rigged one. [/ QUOTE ] Do you have any proof that RP supporters were successfully circumventing the system by blocking their cell phones, but supporters of other candidates weren't, and that this is the reason for the poll result being what it is? If so, please provide it. [/ QUOTE ] "Proof", obviously not. Perhaps you have a better explanation for why he leads in most text and internet polls and never breaks 10% in live polls. [/ QUOTE ] So you're just speculating then? 
|
|
#2
09-06-2007, 09:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Thread on the Foxnews Republican Debate
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] lol, paul is winning the text in vote. [/ QUOTE ] proof how meaningless those polls are [/ QUOTE ] What are the chances these txt polls could translate into an actual turn out for voting? And why is there no mention on Fox about the margin by which Ron Paul is winning "their poll"? [/ QUOTE ] There was. Hannity said it was frantic use of the redial button or something to that effect. [/ QUOTE ] I tried to call twice just to see if you could. I got a recording saying I had already voted. But don't let the facts interfere with Fox News. [/ QUOTE ] Which is easily circumvented by blocking your number. Just because RP is too backward to figure that out it doesnt mean all of his supporters are. Apparently it got past you though. [/ QUOTE ] Can we take this one step further and conclude all the supporters for candidates besides Ron Paul are too backwards to figure things out? Finally we agree. [/ QUOTE ] a more reasonable conclusion would be that they arent fanatics who think its fun to distort a poll, so no, we dont agree. [/ QUOTE ] I suspected that it might be a blocked number thing. But, if thats the case, why the hell would they take any votes from blocked numbers. Sure seems like an extremely easy thing to fix. [/ QUOTE ] To not limit the total number of votes, since so many people block their cell phones. That may change after tonite though. A small count is better than a rigged one. [/ QUOTE ] Do you have any proof that RP supporters were successfully circumventing the system by blocking their cell phones, but supporters of other candidates weren't, and that this is the reason for the poll result being what it is? If so, please provide it. [/ QUOTE ] "Proof", obviously not. Perhaps you have a better explanation for why he leads in most text and internet polls and never breaks 10% in live polls. [/ QUOTE ] So you're just speculating then? [/ QUOTE ] No, he's flat out lying as Borodog's post proves.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
