#281
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
Anybody have any thoughts on TJJ1941 at NL50? [/ QUOTE ] In my database he was loosing pretty bad over 1000k hands, see above. Could be running bad tho. That amount of hands is to little to judge somebody from being a winning or loosing player. I have TJJ1941 flop aggression at 11 that`s crazy and probably a huge leak. |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone have informations about Noble007? I have him on 16.7/9.4/2 over the fairly small sample size of 96 hands. [/ QUOTE ] 16/9/2.6 over 685 hands and 3 different levels. VP$IP at 25NL is even lower at 13 over 262 hands in my book. Combined with a low Att To Steal (16) and a rather high Flop AF (16) I didn't feel to uncomfortable sitting at a table with him yet. I think you can usually just stay out of his way or take a lot of pots from him preflop and on the flop through means of light 3-betting or calling a raise pre and then donking on low flops. |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
cleaner-
Haven't played with you enough to know for sure, but you seem to be a lot better than most of the horrible, easily exploitable regs we play at NL 50. You made a nice check call for value against me at some point knowing I would bluff on the river (a few days ago, I think). GL at the tables. No love for me yet (champstark)? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I actually just started playing again after taking some time off and I'm trying to get my feet wet, so you probably don't have many hands on me. It's gone decently through about 10k hands, though. Shoot me a PM if you ever want to talk about a hand or some dumb nit. |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
IMJEWISH_LOL at 10nl kgo
|
#285
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
cleaner- Haven't played with you enough to know for sure, but you seem to be a lot better than most of the horrible, easily exploitable regs we play at NL 50. You made a nice check call for value against me at some point knowing I would bluff on the river (a few days ago, I think). GL at the tables. No love for me yet (champstark)? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I actually just started playing again after taking some time off and I'm trying to get my feet wet, so you probably don't have many hands on me. It's gone decently through about 10k hands, though. Shoot me a PM if you ever want to talk about a hand or some dumb nit. [/ QUOTE ] Yea, I remember that hand. I have you as a huge winner over 200 hands. I sure don`t mind not having you at the table. Especialy if you are on my left. |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
MY NAME IS FILTHYLARRY
CURRENTLY PLAYING 50NL ON STARS HERE IS A GRAPH OF MY LAST WEEK COMMENTS ON MY PLAY? |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[censored] stars
|
#288
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
O YEAH. HERES ALL THE 50NL PLAYERS I HAVE ON POKERTRACKER WITH AT LEAST 500 HANDS
|
#289
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
posted earlier but no response
anyone have anything on FBDragon? saw him first at 10NL, now i see him at 25NL..running about 22/18/3 and up about 4 25NL buyins... |
#290
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
fwiw my 50nl db:
look at the PFR%. this is why 3betting light and bluffing postflop is problematic: the regs' distribution of hands is too strong for much maneuvering against. look up top 12% of hands on pokerstove to see. |
|
|