pokerev, winning pots without showdown [theory]

[SilentNoise]

nice idea for a filter Double Eagle.

i did your one which is:


but dont you think this filter is better? because often when you have a weak hand you raise the flop or call the flop (like raising donkbets or floating)...and you may do the same on the turn by raising another lead after he calls your donkbet or something like that. this second filter seems to be more profitable for me than the first..


hopefully that graph is big enough to see.

damn..really shold have made all the pics that size. i jut discovered the resize thing in imageshack for message forums.

[Pomtidom]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure this means I fire too many second barrels, right?:

[image][/image]

[/ QUOTE ]
I think this picture is of just one hand, looking at the y-axis. Select cumulative to get a graph of your whole sample.

[TheDivineRod]

This is my unfiltered graph.



And this is one filtered for raised or called pf.



What exactly does this mean? I'm winning in pots I voluntarily enter, so is this just a bad run?

[aislephive]

You're supposed to be up a lot in hands you enter voluntarily to make up for the ton of money you lose from posting the blinds. Your graphs show that you're getting owned in smaller pots, which is a common problem for ssnlers.

[Echelon]

first 68k hands at NL100 PP/FTP:


PT stats: low W$WSF indicating weak tight play (need atleast 40%, call more flops, valuebet more on riv)



Positon stats: (losing tons OOP)



PokerEV graph: (bit of negative variance, but still bad [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img])



PokerEV stats: (losing tons in Non-SD pots, weak tight play)



Eagle filtered: [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]



Custom filtered: (losing tons in small pots, im curious about others winrate using this filter, most likely i give up too often after a cbet)




currently im working on my small pot play and being more aggro. moved down to NL50 to fix these huge leaks. any advice?

[SilentNoise]

is it possible to win lots in small pots if the people you are playing against are always calling you down? it would imply bluffing calling stations which cant be good can it?

also, carrotsnake's graph..is that at 200nl?

[Mr_Pathetic]

Um I got a NL5 graph in here somewhere where my green line unfiltered is right under my blue and red lines and I am pretty sure people call you down a lot at NL 5.

[Noam Chomsky]

[ QUOTE ]


also, carrotsnake's graph..is that at 200nl?

[/ QUOTE ]

no chance.

[Noam Chomsky]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure this means I fire too many second barrels, right?:

[image][/image]

[/ QUOTE ]
I think this picture is of just one hand, looking at the y-axis. Select cumulative to get a graph of your whole sample.

[/ QUOTE ]

oops. guess I shouldn't have bet THAT turn....: )

[TheDivineRod]

[ QUOTE ]
Your graphs show that you're getting owned in smaller pots, which is a common problem for ssnlers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Whats the best way to not get owned in smaller pots? Is it betting the turn more often,calling down more on the river, etc?