#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sharkscope No Longer Acceptable on Stars
Stars does not screen rake I know this for sure, I agree with Nicho as long you dont ever mention it should be fine. I also agree if fish were complaining it is best long run for this to happen.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sharkscope No Longer Acceptable on Stars
Next time I see someone ridiculing a fish because of their sharkscope stats I'm gonna report them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sharkscope No Longer Acceptable on Stars
I've never seen this happen, but I mainly play HUSNG. I've had people mention my SS before, but nothing like "omg you're a huge fish."
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sharkscope No Longer Acceptable on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
I've never seen this happen, but I mainly play HUSNG. I've had people mention my SS before, but nothing like "omg you're a huge fish." [/ QUOTE ] it really doesnt happen much in husng, but in regular sngs and mtts it is very common in my experience. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sharkscope No Longer Acceptable on Stars
I don't play tourneys anymore, but I remember it being common for some [censored] to go through EVERYONE's SS at the table.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sharkscope No Longer Acceptable on Stars
I guess some thanks should go to those who bring Sharkscope stats to the fish for free after getting three-outed on the river. One time some fish asked me if I knew of the software that displayed your profit, because some other guy said he had a really negative ROI. Of course, I didn't know what he was talking about, but he sent an e-mail to Stars to find out. HEY, MORONS, DON'T TAP THE F-ING GLASS, GEEZ.
On the other hand, I always did feel that Sharkscope is too similar a concept to the central shared database, and at best it was iffy ethically. It does put the fish in a huge disadvantage, especially in HU where table selection is everything. I wouldn't mind losing Sharkscope too bad if everyone else loses it, though I would miss it when it comes to collecting my own stats. |
|
|