60 overshove TT?

[plexiq]

[ QUOTE ]
can these situations always acurately be analized by sngwiz? i'm putting utg at 24% , never folding, and button at 10% never folding, and its still a push..

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe SnGWiz compares your push EQ with the EQ with *current* stacks, to decide if its a push?

If so, it does make a significant mistake here. We can expect BU to be quite ahead of UTG - i.e. even if we fold here, our EQ at the end of the hand will be higher than "now". Thus, we would have to compare EQ|PU vs "Post-Hand-EQ"|Fold, to decide if a hand is a push.

I think SnGWiz & SNGPT are both biased towards looser pushing here.

[SitNGo Wizard]

[ QUOTE ]
I believe SnGWiz compares your push EQ with the EQ with *current* stacks, to decide if its a push?

[/ QUOTE ]

This assumption is incorrect. When you fold, the Wizard analyzes all possible actions of your opponents, including when they get all-in together.

[deepextragully]

utg is opening a ton of hands and button is prob isolating any ace given history, makes this a really easy shove imo.

[darks]

If your read is right, then ok, push. FF_Woodycooks said it best, mind the gap concept. UTG is short, but with what kind of cards could he really raise. Okay, you have a read on the villain with big stack, but what about the initial raiser? why is he cripled with just 900 left? did he play ok, and just got unlucky? did he minraise couse he wanted action?
Lots of questions beeing unaswered i fold this.

[plexiq]

[ QUOTE ]
When you fold, the Wizard analyzes all possible actions of your opponents, including when they get all-in together.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for clearing this up. This means SnGWiz should actually handle this situation quite accurately?

(I have another, related question i was wondering about: Does SNGWiz deal correctly with Sidepots/Splitpots in 3-way Pots? But i realize this is getting a bit off-topic [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])

[RexWoo]

plexiq : it does