|
|
#51
09-03-2007, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
[ QUOTE ]
I was thinking along the lines of every single post being about the same exact thing. Redbean definitely makes his case far better, but its just as tired and stale, IMO. [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't say its tired and stale, only because there are so many idiots still spitting out dumb arguments 
|
|
#52
09-03-2007, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
ive made alot of good statisical arguments about vick making the Falcons a winner.
The Falcons will be 3 - 13 this year but if Vick played they would probably be 8 - 8. But none of this attributable to Vick. Its impossible that Vick does anything to make a team win games because his passing stats suck. Ive yet to see any convincing arguments on here on why Vick is not good at football
|
|
#53
09-03-2007, 09:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
[ QUOTE ]
Redbean definitely makes his case far better, but its just as tired and stale, IMO. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, it's tired. That's what happens when people insist on bringing it up constantly for 4 years. I also agree it's stale. That's because unlike the allegations, the truth never changes. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] It's the same old story, over and over and over.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
