#1
|
|||
|
|||
2/4 top pair vs. LAG
Villian this hand is Mdom, a very aggro regular that I have at 43/32/3.5. He is more than capable of pulling big bluffs and is a good hand reader. My flop float here actually hit something. My line looks really weak, how often is he triple barelling me here?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) MP ($400) CO ($631) Hero ($989.50) SB ($732) BB ($104.20) UTG ($92.40) Preflop: Hero is Button with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $12</font>, CO calls $12, Hero calls $12, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>. Flop: ($42) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">MP bets $32</font>, CO folds, Hero calls $32. Turn: ($106) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">MP bets $72</font>, Hero calls $72. River: ($250) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">MP bets $176</font>, Hero calls $176. Final Pot: $602 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 top pair vs. LAG
why are you floating on this flop when you can probably expect this guy to 2barrel you on the turn a lot of the time?
As played, I'm not sure what is best. I think you are probably the best judge here. I mean, if he's a good hand-reader, it doesn't make alot of sense for him to be betting so strong for value. He should put you on some kind of stubborn weak hand that isn't going to be able to call a strong bet. So I really think it just comes down to your own reads on him, and your image, flow of the game etc. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 top pair vs. LAG
looks good
edit: flop is awful. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 top pair vs. LAG
Thin flop float. Turn and river should be played like this because of it.
|
|
|