BEAT Am no longer a winning player - Page 4

amazinmets73 · #31 08-30-2007, 09:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
you played ~250k hands without PT? sounds made up.

[/ QUOTE ]No sir, another 2T2 who im friends with can vouch for me

rewt75 · #32 08-30-2007, 10:25 PM

I'm in the same boat as you at the same limit. Games are harder for sure.

Lurker. · #33 08-30-2007, 10:32 PM

you don't use a hud and you play 80k hands a month? that's crazy.

holland3r · #34 08-30-2007, 10:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
you don't use a hud and you play 80k hands a month? that's retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]

amazinmets73 · #35 08-31-2007, 03:17 AM

[ QUOTE ]
you don't use a hud and you play 80k hands a month? that's crazy.

[/ QUOTE ]i have pokertracker, paid 55 bucks for it and havent figured out how to use it. im stupid

TheJokerIsWild · #36 08-31-2007, 03:23 AM

I know you guys probably don't believe this, but I've been playing for 5 years now and have never used PT/HUDS. I've consistenly beaten the games from NL100-1000 (don't play 1000 anymore--too hard).

Maybe I'd be better with the HUDs, but I tried it for a day or so and hated it. Besides that, I'm morally opposed to them.

Johnes Benjamin · #37 08-31-2007, 03:28 AM

NL100 games do seem tough to me lately but I think I'm just running bad.

They certainly aren't 10k-breakeven tougher
If you care, I moved down to 50NL for a couple days to get my confidence and a couple buyins back. I think that is a good strategy when you are losing.

SABR42 · #38 08-31-2007, 04:12 AM

I know OP IRL.

He's telling the truth.

12 tabling 100 NL for a ton of hours, add supernova bonuses on top of that, 10K a month isn't THAT hard.

hurtchow · #39 08-31-2007, 10:33 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I'd be better with the HUDs, but I tried it for a day or so and hated it. Besides that, I'm morally opposed to them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm the same way. Good to hear it.

LethargicMule · #40 08-31-2007, 11:08 AM

Graph already?