#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL - Thin value shove against a shorty?
I fold this pretty quick vs this player, especially with his stacksize.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL - Thin value shove against a shorty?
[ QUOTE ]
in position i think i prefer a call, then call or shove good turns, if you really want to get it in. i dont think folding is all that bad though. [/ QUOTE ] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL - Thin value shove against a shorty?
[ QUOTE ]
i probably fold this without any specific reads [/ QUOTE ] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL - Thin value shove against a shorty?
Please fold. I fail to see the value in shoving when your opponent's range consists of Qx, 88, 22, big spades, combo spades, and occasional small spades/pocket pairs JJ and lower. Assuming your opponent isn't a total idiot, the heavier part of his range is weighed towards hands that beat you. You have no FE here ever, I find it amazing that someone suggested you can fold out Qx by shoving. The guy just check raised the flop for 40% of a short stack, you think he's folding top pair to a shove?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL - Thin value shove against a shorty?
I doubt he ever folds Qx but that's probably obvious. I vote fold
|
|
|