|
|
#11
08-29-2007, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL - Fold turned flush?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fwiw I think pf is raise >>>>>>>>>> limp >>> fold [/ QUOTE ] Against a "weak station" limp and a "drooler" limp, a pfr is so bad. fold > limp >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; raise IMO. [/ QUOTE ] I like a raise against these types of players because 80% of the time you will isolate one of them and they will fold to a c-bet. I like limping AXs so all the idiots can play 84s and stack off with their lower flushes but I pretty much don't limp with anything else. 
|
|
#12
08-29-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50NL - Fold turned flush?
[ QUOTE ]
nothing wrong with limping a baby sc here imo, I've won some of my biggest pots in situations like this. [/ QUOTE ] How low will you go though? 45s is the lowest i'll play. 23s i'll muck from all positions.
|
|
#13
08-29-2007, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50NL - Fold turned flush?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fwiw I think pf is raise >>>>>>>>>> limp >>> fold [/ QUOTE ] Against a "weak station" limp and a "drooler" limp, a pfr is so bad. fold > limp >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; raise IMO. [/ QUOTE ] We cannot put much trust in two-pair hands made w/ 23 and making 2p is quite some part of our value w/ the SC.
|
|
#14
08-29-2007, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50NL - Fold turned flush?
I can't believe I generated so much discussion with my preflop call.
Like I said, with 2 fish (40+ VPIP), I'm calling a very very wide range of hands there, as well as isolating with any AXs, any suited connector 76s and above, down to like A9o, QTo. As far as limping goes, if I'm not busy on any other tables and feeling particularly bored, I might limp here with something like 65o. Limping with 32s wasn't my issue. It was the flush. The consensus was to call down, which is what I did in hand. I still think I should have folded, and will next time.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
