aggression factor vs. aggression frequency

[whangarei]

I would like to hear a discussion on the relative advantages of using the aggression factor stat vs. the PAHUD aggression frequency stat. The aggression frequency is defined as the % of aggressive actions ( (bets+raises) / (bets+raises-calls-folds) ) post-flop. Of course aggression factor is ( (%Raise + %Bet) / %Call).

The problem with AF is that if a player just bets or folds he will look like a maniac, even if he bets once every 100 decisions and folds the rest. So aggression frequency looks like a better indicator of post-flop aggression.

So, I'm leaning towards using aggression ferquency in my HUD rather than aggression factor. I would appreciate hearing others thoughts on this. I've also included a fun poll [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]:

[Demogorgon]

Poll wasn't funny at all but I voted for aggression frequency. Reason being the already stated flaws that original AF suffers from.

[tubasteve]

frequency FTW

[whangarei]

For anyone who answered "both" could you describe what different meaning you attribute to each stat and how you use it to ascertain a player's "true" aggression?

[whangarei]

shameless bump for the evening crowd