![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To have the higher winrate it is better played Tag (22/18) or nit (11/5) in NL10 ?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
its best to play every hand, you cant win them if you dont play
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The play is usually so terrible that either style should work out just the same, it really comes down to certain table dynamics for one to be effective over the other.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seriously imo at NL10 optimal stats are 14/8. But then again Ive played like 2k lifetime there, so what do i know/care. :P
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd go with TAG. They get scared to hell when they see aggression.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
its best to play every hand, you cant win them if you dont play [/ QUOTE ] lol |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
its best to play every hand, you cant win them if you dont play [/ QUOTE ] QFT. "Can't win if you fold." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can be a winning player as a lag or tag, you should concentrate on your postflop play rather then thinking about being a tag or lag.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
People dont pay enough attention for LAG style to pay off and few really care to differentiate between a TAG and a nit at uNL, thus, imo making being a nit more profitable.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
People dont pay enough attention for LAG style to pay off and few really care to differentiate between a TAG and a nit at uNL, thus, imo making being a nit more profitable. [/ QUOTE ] I usually play a 21/18 game |
![]() |
|
|