Ohhh Baluga.... - Page 3

shyturtle27 · #21 08-24-2007, 01:02 PM

why, why, why? if we're going to put any more money in the pot then the opponent is going to committ the rest of his stack anyway. Just poooosh.

members_only · #22 08-24-2007, 01:03 PM

I was replying to traz's question, not suggesting a line for OP to take

Daniel LeClaire · #23 08-24-2007, 01:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]
to those of you saying fold...

How do you think villain plays KT-KQ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think he calls flop and then min-raises the turn with those hands. He would just call down. That's what calling stations do and he, for sure, is a calling station.

sww · #24 08-24-2007, 01:09 PM

But his line would be quite ok for KT, of course it doesnt mean anything since he is not ok. btw, 40/10/2 is not a calling station but a semimaniac. AF 2 is not low at all given his preflop stats.

traz · #25 08-24-2007, 01:12 PM

This guy is not a calling station. His stats are very typical of a player who sees flops until he hits one, and then stacks off like a donk. He think he's slowplaying you!

Given stack sizes, odds, and the typical style of this player, this is such an auto push

Daniel LeClaire · #26 08-24-2007, 01:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
But his line would be quite ok for KT, of course it doesnt mean anything since he is not ok. btw, 40/10/2 is not a calling station but a semimaniac. AF 2 is not low at all given his preflop stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't use AF, personally. I don't think it's a good representation of how aggressive a player is. I constantly had weak-tight players with high AF because of how AF is calculated. If anything I think his preflop stats are more of an indicator of how he plays.

ICMoney · #27 08-24-2007, 02:33 PM

For the pushers - would you still push if each of you started with 100bb?

I have a tough time in these spots.

Thanks.

shyturtle27 · #28 08-24-2007, 02:56 PM

No way. That is a place where you can fold according to the baluga theorum. The stack-to-pot ratio on the flop would be too high to committ against even such a loose opponent. When 100BB you need to try to play smaller pots with TPTK.

traz · #29 08-24-2007, 03:40 PM

Against this guy I would absolutely get it in with 100bb stacks. This isn't some tag, it's a laggy fish.

Also, baluga theorem is best applied to c/c, c/r. It's not nearly as reliable in this kind of situation.

VivaHate · #30 08-24-2007, 03:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Against this guy I would absolutely get it in with 100bb stacks. This isn't some tag, it's a laggy fish.

Also, baluga theorem is best applied to c/c, c/r. It's not nearly as reliable in this kind of situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, this fish would be the reason i'm at this table, and this would be the sort of hand i'd be waiting for to stack him.He's not complete calling station as someone said earlier AF2 includes plenty of raises.