Why is it that pokerstars is such a popular site for online players?

[HoneyBadger]

[ QUOTE ]
supernova is 30% rakeback if you take 1500$ for points bundles.

if you do amazon or expedia vouchers it's even a bit more.


but whats the deal with 4x% party like site... i guess I need to have a PM [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
No, I just meant with 25% rb at stars you pay an equal absolute amount at party with 43% rb, because the stars rake is lower to start with. So I was comparing to the various, easily found, 30% RB deals on different rooms.

Of course it still can't compete with some 100% rb prop-deal.

[MartynasD]

don`t forget about fish.a lot of pure players in stars.if u loosing player in some of the sites,u might get wining one in stars.and if u make to supernova u will do ok with all your cash back,allso it`s free tourneys going every week 50k for supernova,and 20k for any of vip,in the end of the month another 50k for gold members.i`m usualy playing it simple.all in or nothing.and i`m finishing in money position a lot.as nobody playing it seriously.well stars is a choice

[HoneyBadger]

In my experience stars has by far the toughest competition...

[Beastmaster]

Honey- u ever play on Absolute?

[ZOMG_RIGGED!]

Thats exactly what I was thinking. a 6-man table at Absolute usually means at least 3 2+2ers. I remember two weeks ago thre was a Cowboys33 siting and I swarmed to get a seat on every single one of his tables. On two of the tables I could name 3 of the others players from this site and the third I new the screen name of all 4 other 2+2ers

[HoneyBadger]

No, I have not played there.

[jukofyork]

[ QUOTE ]
In my experience stars has by far the toughest competition...

[/ QUOTE ]
They need some terrible customer service (like Party) to scare away some of them nits.

Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]