![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I stuck some cash on Stars earlier this week, mainly to mess around with as tilt relief when FTP dng's go bad, and noticed these hourly $2.20 sats to the $100k. I'm sure these are absolutely perfect for building up a small roll quickly, considering they pay out around 18% of the field, and that field is likely terrible and has no idea how to play a sat. I'm wondering what people think a realistic ITM% is for these, similarly with the multi-table sit and go sats. Any ideas?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
60% for the 2.20 sats seems reasonable
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can do much better than that, its the easiest field I've seen.
I managed to get 120% ROI there and I'm a donkey. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
You can do much better than that, its the easiest field I've seen. I managed to get 120% ROI there and I'm a donkey. [/ QUOTE ] lol samplesizeaments |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
You can do much better than that, its the easiest field I've seen. I managed to get 120% ROI there and I'm a donkey. [/ QUOTE ] I highly doubt anything much higher than 60% itm is attainable since that is what the OP is asking. 60% itm = ~200% roi. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
didn't notice he was talking about ITM and not ROI.
my bad |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've played 45 of them, and cashed 14 seats, for 31% ITM, and 56% ROI.
I don't feel I have run very good or bad in these. Ken |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
60% for the 2.20 sats seems reasonable [/ QUOTE ] ITM or ROI? I've played close to 20 of these and won seats exactly half of the time. I have no idea what a sustainable ROI would be but it wouldn't surprise me if an expert could maintain above 100%. Whatever. These are perfect bankroll builders. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any way to filter these in PT? Mine seem to be grouped with regular $2.20 mtts.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have some FPP and want to convert them to cash, you could try the 70FPP STTs too. I played 5, won 3 and they played much like playmoney-SnGs (allin 1st hand with Q9o and such).
|
![]() |
|
|