#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
Fair play.
Oh and I fold. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
Why do you fold?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
I don't think I fold. Villain's play doesn't really add up to anything that beats us.
IMO, it looks like A6 more than anything else. Still could be a flush or 35 or 75. Who knows. There are lots of hands you beat that play this way imo. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
if no diamond comes on the turn i think this is a fold.
this is very consistant with a donk's flush line. I call this. in general im not a huge fan of possibly going bronke in limped pots but w/e |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
[ QUOTE ]
In genral im not a huge fan of possibly going broke in limped pots for this much, but w/e [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: Under Full House -- call massive overbet?
I call. OP has a LAG image and he bet once, shut down, then blocked river. I think villain tries to get some value from a top boat hand...calling is EV+
that being said I'll guess villain had 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Result
Villain had 76, and MHING.
|
|
|