50nl session - Hand Analysis

[osh]

I just can't get it - is it a joke or you writing serious?! If you are serious, please re-read all answers one more time.

[Landlord79]

[ QUOTE ]
1st = nice

2&3 are spew from the very start

[/ QUOTE ]

All three are spew. 1. Why are you taking low PPs to the river? Do you think that 2 outers are good draws? 2. & 3. Fold pf.

[Mingdu]

I raise those small pp sometimes ... can work nicely

Cont bet and he only calls? He's on a draw ... and if I think that then I'm sure he's floating me on the turn

I've seen this hand played out a ton of times in 50nl. i don't think hero was ever behind here

[Teddie]

[ QUOTE ]
I raise those small pp sometimes ... can work nicely

Cont bet and he only calls? He's on a draw ... and if I think that then I'm sure he's floating me on the turn

I've seen this hand played out a ton of times in 50nl. i don't think hero was ever behind here

[/ QUOTE ]


Should we not raise the turn then?

[Mike Kelley]

I think villain had a small pp here not a draw.

[Mingdu]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I raise those small pp sometimes ... can work nicely

Cont bet and he only calls? He's on a draw ... and if I think that then I'm pretty sure he's floating me on the turn

I've seen this hand played out a ton of times in 50nl. i don't think hero was ever behind here

[/ QUOTE ]


Should we not raise the turn then?

[/ QUOTE ]

FMP [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

with a quality read on villian, yeah, I'd raise that turn ... pot control and all that ... i dunno, too bad results were posted, skews everything

I certainly don't mind the preflop raise or the flop bet ... the turn call could be a turn raise

[threads13]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just want to go on record that I think Q8s is a fine stealing hand if you have reads.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, but if he bets that flop he MUST check that turn since there are no draws out and the initial PFR is still there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably. If he was raising this hand from the button then it should have been against tight blinds.

I didn't actually read all the hands I just was everyone picking on a preflop raise.

[kidpokeher]

[ QUOTE ]
All 3 hands are horrible and funny.

Move down in limits until you learn ABC poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

[inverted]

[ QUOTE ]
Please let my give you my analysis, because reviewing these today just doesn't look pretty.

Hand 1 - Is it +EV to raise with those really small pairs? I always find that just flat calling with lots of limper rarely leads to a huge pot. On the turn when he lead bet for 8, i didn't really believe him there, seemed like he would have gone for a c-r or c-c if he had the queen. Miracle card on the river, but didn't really matter, perhaps he had the 9.

Hand 2 - Problem with this hand was that i had no idea were i was the whole time and i was betting to protect it. I knew i was beat on the river, i'm just wondering do you think i was beat the whole hand? I know my problem started when i flat called the min raise but my hand wasn't to bad to play in position.

Hand 3 - Well looks like the biggest donkey move ever. Just wondering from a math stand point how bad it was. I figured that because there were so many limpers, the pot was around $10.3 and it was 6.8 for me to call, i was pretty sure he would do this with any 2 high cards. Also i thought there would be some added value because it would really loosen up my image. Plus it would be fun

[/ QUOTE ]

1. If you don't believe him in hand 1 RAISE THE TURN. Don't play for your 2 outer :/

2. What are you protecting against?

3. Move down to NL10 I need monies

[dividius]

1 - raise or fold turn. From the looks of it, you could have bluffed him out on the river anyways, but don't wait till the river; bluff him out on the turn.

2 - fold PF. You need a lot of steal equity to call with this hand. With no reads, we don't know what our steal equity is, so fold.

3 - fold PF man, geez. 68s? Yikes....

These are all pretty bad. Probably why you posted them together, right?