I wanted to check and then bet anyway

[HOWMANY]

Full 60 game. Villain is some young guy who is running pretty well so he obviously thinks he is a genius because when you win every hand you play for 3 hours straight you must be great.

Villain raises UTG, some fish calls in sb, I 3bet AsKs in BB, villain calls, fish call.

Flop JJ6r
Fish checks, I bet, villain raises, I call

Turn K
I bet villain calls

River T
I bet villain raises, I can't think of a single realistic hand I beat

[blackasthma]

me either, but i'd call just to see what genius has. if he's got TT or AQ, then put him on a real power trip...

[smurfitup]

any read besides the fact that he's running well? his hand looks an awful lot like TT. though, an argument can be made in favor of calling since a lot of these young guys who run well in a session will sometimes do some stupid [censored] like bluff-raise the river. but what hand could he have that would raise the flop, call the turn, and raise the river as a bluff? i'd vomit and fold.

also, from his perspective, the most likely hand you have is what you actually do have. unless he's a moron, he's not going to try to bluff you off of ak on that board.

[private joker]

I agree with the post title; check-call the river.

[smurfitup]

hmm, yeah. this is one of those spots that is really villain-dependent. i mean, if it's a donk/tilter who refuses to fold his 88 or whatever, then i would bet. but, against a good player, it's hard to imagine a worse hand he would have that would call us on that river. qq is all i could think of. check-call is seeming more and more attractive.

[cowboy billy]

I think I would check call turn, since he's going to bet it 100% of the time anyway and we realy don't like calling a raise also

then I'd b/f river