|
|
#41
03-08-2006, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ending a dispute
[ QUOTE ]
I see theoretically how "better" players should pass up tiny edges because their superiority over the field will make up for whatever minute gains they pass up, but what I don't see is how that somehow is quantified by equating the edge in the hand to your ROI. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. Once I was done with my post I came around to that. 
|
|
#42
03-09-2006, 03:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ending a dispute
alright. I tried this once. Did all of you guys really fail to read this: http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/c...lbert0306.html ?
Gilbert's conclusion is that his PFIC model for tournament EV is theoretically and empirically most accurate. According to that model, if you are a 10% ROI player in a 10 man tournament, you need 56% equity in order to accept a double up or bust bet. That doesn't even take into account that you always are offered better than double up or bust, because there will always be dead money in the pot (almost always a few bets before the all-in, but always blinds).
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
