|
|
|
|
#1
08-16-2007, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Was this ruling correct?
[ QUOTE ]
The dealer's viewpoint is flat-out wrong, because it lets MP1 get away with seeing the rest of the hand without any risk of being busted. I'd say if it was a misunderstanding, hand continues and SB knows MP1's hand, better pay more attention. [/ QUOTE ] Well, by all of MP1's actions, he's looking like he has the better hand...he could just as easily be getting screwed by not doubling up on his remaining chips as he would be getting helped by keeping his remaining chips unrisked. But yes, dealer is a donk that just plays for entertainment, no way he's right here. 
|
|
#2
08-17-2007, 02:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was this ruling correct?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The dealer's viewpoint is flat-out wrong, because it lets MP1 get away with seeing the rest of the hand without any risk of being busted. I'd say if it was a misunderstanding, hand continues and SB knows MP1's hand, better pay more attention. [/ QUOTE ] Well, by all of MP1's actions, he's looking like he has the better hand...he could just as easily be getting screwed by not doubling up on his remaining chips as he would be getting helped by keeping his remaining chips unrisked. But yes, dealer is a donk that just plays for entertainment, no way he's right here. [/ QUOTE ] and you're a pro, grinding out that home game circuit? LL has it right
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
