|
|
#11
08-14-2007, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving smaller cardrooms
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Finally, the rooms need to make their environment squeeky clean [/ QUOTE ] Squeeky clean? Won't ever happen. Especially with the element that gambling attracts. The truth is, poker in cardrooms will always have a distinct element of seediness. b [/ QUOTE ] I assume you mean standalone cardrooms like in California? Many cardrooms at upscale and luxury casinos are not seedy at all, but in my experience poker-only establishments are all varying degrees of gross. 
|
|
#12
08-14-2007, 11:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Improving smaller cardrooms
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Finally, the rooms need to make their environment squeeky clean [/ QUOTE ] Squeeky clean? Won't ever happen. Especially with the element that gambling attracts. The truth is, poker in cardrooms will always have a distinct element of seediness. b [/ QUOTE ] While Canterbury is FAR from a small poker room, it is exceptionally squeaky clean. They also put up with exactly zero [censored] from players.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
