|
|
|
|
#1
08-14-2007, 01:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Four Winds 200NL Hand #3
I don't mean to be overly results-oriented, but it looks like you deliberately left K6 out of his range. At a loose live 1/2 NL table, I think we need to include a lot more crappy 6x hands in his range here, hands that will probably not fold the turn for any amount of money.
|
|
#2
08-14-2007, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Four Winds 200NL Hand #3
[ QUOTE ]
I don't mean to be overly results-oriented, but it looks like you deliberately left K6 out of his range. At a loose live 1/2 NL table, I think we need to include a lot more crappy 6x hands in his range here, hands that will probably not fold the turn for any amount of money. [/ QUOTE ] I agree... live players love to limp any suited cards. Seeing any 6xs would not shock me one bit. It's really hard to put him on a 7 here unless it is 67 or A7. I'm probably making it $75 to go on the turn and pushing basically any river (whether that's good or not [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img])
|
|
#3
08-14-2007, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Four Winds 200NL Hand #3
[ QUOTE ]
I don't mean to be overly results-oriented, but it looks like you deliberately left K6 out of his range. [/ QUOTE ] No, I just never conceived of it. When I think of the likeliest hands to contain exactly one 6, I usually think of A6 and the connectors and semiconnectors. Smoker was in late enough position (in fact, I think he was OTB) that I should have included random suited crap like K6s, but it would have been weeks before I put him on K6o.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
