#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
Lurker, you [censored] [censored], keep trying to act like you're cool when you're not
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
Shouldn't this have been moved to ATF (or BBV4L or somewhere)?
* Edit: Oops. Thought Lurker was a mod, as I had my cursor on his name and then it shows the same green as a mod's green in the scheme I use. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Lurker\'s title (Gildwulf)
That was my question too: it was one of the GBBV Mods. He was posting fine there. I asked him twice to change posts, which he did immediately.
fyi |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
I've talked with Lurker by e-mail and an unban seems ok here. I'll take care of that now.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
wow, even though he circumvented his ban by creating a new account, trolled forums with the new account, and denied it was him?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
Lurker is a troll, Id prefer to keep him banned
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lurker is a [censored] who posts mostly low content [censored]
[ QUOTE ]
even though he circumvented his ban by creating a new account [/ QUOTE ] I'd already come to an agreement with him by the time I found this out. We can always ban him again if he causes problems anyway. |
|
|