|
|
#11
08-13-2007, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: lower stakes HU NL not beatable?
If any of the NL guys wants to right a good complete answer to this question, I'll and it to the sticky. It seems like this comes up every week.
|
|
#12
08-13-2007, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU NL not beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
If any of the NL guys wants to right a good complete answer to this question, I'll and it to the sticky. It seems like this comes up every week. [/ QUOTE ] Does it need math? Just put some graphs up and KERPOW!!!! self-answering question.
|
|
#13
08-13-2007, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU NL not beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If any of the NL guys wants to right a good complete answer to this question, I'll and it to the sticky. It seems like this comes up every week. [/ QUOTE ] Does it need math? Just put some graphs up and KERPOW!!!! self-answering question. [/ QUOTE ] No, just say what limits of NL HU are beatable and which probably aren't if any.
|
|
#14
08-13-2007, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU NL not beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If any of the NL guys wants to right a good complete answer to this question, I'll and it to the sticky. It seems like this comes up every week. [/ QUOTE ] Does it need math? Just put some graphs up and KERPOW!!!! self-answering question. [/ QUOTE ] This is really one of those "how long is a piece of string questions". The real question is not "is it beatable" but rather "can I(whoever you are) beat it ?" and the answer is - only you can really find out/answer that question. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#16
08-13-2007, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?
my point is, should i wait till Im rolled for 200NL? (got little over 4k now) or just start playing 100NL hu. Much difference in HU opponents? 200NL is like 2/3 the rake right?
|
|
#18
08-13-2007, 06:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?
i dunno i feel pretty good playing with 30bi. And im beating 100NL for like little over 5BB/100 over 30k hands. But had some sick tilt sessions..
Thats one thing i hesitate to start playing HU alot, it tilts me so fast. no thing tilts me faster then hit and runners :S . I guess you guys tag those guys? but maybe u need 40bi to play hu (more variance).
|
|
#19
08-13-2007, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?
I don't tag them, I don't really care to be honest.
HU is a lesson in patience that is for sure. Just have the discipline to quit when tilted even if that is 100 hands into a session.
|
|
#20
08-14-2007, 12:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?
I checked my recent PT stats, and the summary tab says that over 60k hands the players in my database are losing at a clip of 2.55 PTBB/100. So $5.10/100 hands or so. I've lost all my other databases, so if someone could say what that number is for them in a 6-max setting, you'd have a better idea about the rake differences.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
