#1
|
|||
|
|||
100NL AKs - is this standard readless?
I only had like 25 hands on the villain (SB) so readless. I guess the question is does he do this with TT-QQ and AQ/AK enough to balance out KK/AA?
(I assume he raises AA/KK or value rather than overshove - this seems a bit weak to me) Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) <u>SB: $120.60</u> BB: $36.85 UTG: $47.85 MP: $19.50 CO: $101.00 <u>Hero (BTN): $127.15</u> Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players) <font color="red">UTG raises to $4.00</font>, 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $15.00</font>, <font color="red">SB raises all-in to $120.60</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls $105.60 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL AKs - is this standard readless?
Eugh. Instafold.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL AKs - is this standard readless?
[ QUOTE ]
Eugh. Instafold. [/ QUOTE ] Word. Guy is cold 4-bet shoving, you're only getting 1.33 to 1. He's never doing this with AQ here IMO unless he's a complete moron. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL AKs - is this standard readless?
Fold. You don't even have odds to call against a range of JJ+, AK. The only way this could be a call is if you think the fact that he pushed instead of making a smaller 4-bet means AA and KK need to be discounted somewhat from his range. With no reads, we can't make this assumption.
|
|
|