Theory Question : Unexploitable Plays

[darnold305]

can someone please post a link to the article

thanks

darnold

[BradleyT]

http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/i...guson0607.html

[ImsaKidd]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a hand that is a push no matter what your opponent's calling range is. Even if he calls 100% of the time, your best move is still push.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hm, ok. That makes sense. So that would mean the very best hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big, and then that range grows as blinds increase and opponent stack sizes decrease?

[/ QUOTE ]
Uhh, kinda. No hands are unexploitable when the stacks are big. For example it would be foolish to push level 1 with AA. You are right, however, about more hands becoming unexploitable as the stacks get smaller and blinds get bigger. But, usually blinds have to VERY big in comparison to the stacks for an unexploitable situation to occur.

[/ QUOTE ]

Aces are.

Unexploitable means the play is +EV if your opponents see your cards and play perfectly.

[IcemanDan]

Thanks for all the answers. Any concrete examples of an unexploitable play?

[DevinLake]

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for all the answers. Any concrete examples of an unexploitable play?

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't that what started this discussion? A hand by z32?

[AMT]

my best advice for gaining a feel for unexploitable situations/pushes is futzing with sngpt/sngwiz and finding what factors effect what and stack size differences and the like.