Pedo's web site - is he doing anything wrong?

[bekman]

After some searches on Lexis Nexis, and knowing a little of the legal history of <u>The Anarchist's Cookbook</u>, I came across some information that will lend well to the discussion of what he might have to do before he would cross the line according to our current legal system.

According to Bakken, "The test applied to speech which is likely to incite imminent lawless action is claimed to be the appropriate test to be applied to speech providing detailed illegal instruction. (32 McGeorge L. Rev. 289)" While there are other tests, of course, this is the only aspect worth examining in this case. Due to the pedo's lack of detailed illegal instruction, even though his website could be easily construed and used in an illegal manner, this test would handedly fail.

On that note, I do think it is great that there is a restraining order working against him. When one route fails, leave it to pissed off people to find another.