![]() |
|
View Poll Results: RB (Choose 2) | |||
Portis (@Houston) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 48.57% |
Kevin Jones (GB) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 22.86% |
Fred Taylor (@Ind) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 25.71% |
R. Droughns (Balt) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
D. McAllister (Atl) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.86% |
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] LOL @ her "i hope this doesn't come off as a brag." Grinding $20 sngs for a living.. BRAG!!! [/ QUOTE ] I play sngs and real job>>>>>>>>>>>> ;>>>>>>>>>>>>& gt;>>>>>>>>>>>> ;>>>>>>>>>>>>& gt;>>>>>>>>> grinding $20 sngs especially given the fact she is awful. [/ QUOTE ] You really think I'm awful pudge? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Tell ya what, go find someone else with a 39% ROI over 11,000 SNGs, at any level. Until you do, you have no basis for an argument. It's possible I made a mistake or two in the SNG we reviewed together, but your analysis had mistakes in it too. So if you want to call me imperfect, have a blast, but awful? LOL. [/ QUOTE ] I'm just curious to know if you plan to start playing more than 1 table at a time. [/ QUOTE ] I currently four-table on Stars or Full Tilt, but three-table on UB when I play. I'm somewhat new (six months) to playing more than two at a time. Most of the stats you probably are looking at are from when I am teaching, and I only play (usually) one-table when I'm teaching. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jenn, I just don't understand how you can make claims that you have over 11k sngs at 39% roi and give no proof that this is actually true.
also just out of curiosity, why haven't you moved up to the higher level sngs yet? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jenn do you have PT screenshots of your stats? This would be much better proof than sharkscope (provided your db is complete).
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jenn,
What none of us understand is why you don't play higher. If you're decent you'd make way more playing the 60s. Since you spend you time playing against opponents who have no clue how to play optimally, we assume you're not very skilled. The other option is to accept that you play low stakes for some other reason and you don't care about maximizing your return on your time. That just doesn't make sense to someone with a poker mindset. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Jenn, What none of us understand is why you don't play higher. If you're decent you'd make way more playing the 60s. Since you spend you time playing against opponents who have no clue how to play optimally, we assume you're not very skilled. The other option is to accept that you play low stakes for some other reason and you don't care about maximizing your return on your time. That just doesn't make sense to someone with a poker mindset. [/ QUOTE ] Glad you brought that up! I have just started to try the higher levels. Up until now, I have had virtually no time to play with all the teaching and my previous job (two full time jobs) I'll be venturing into the $55+5s soon with more regularity |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Jenn, I just don't understand how you can make claims that you have over 11k sngs at 39% roi and give no proof that this is actually true. also just out of curiosity, why haven't you moved up to the higher level sngs yet? [/ QUOTE ] I make the claim because it is true. Up until less than a year ago (2000 SNGs ago), I never even tried a tracking program. |
![]() |
|
|