#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 6.5: river bet of weak villian
[ QUOTE ]
1) You don't need him to be a retard to raise the river. You just need him to lack the ability to see into your soul, and even sharkscope cannot tell you that. 2) You didn't have this info at the table, so it is not relevant to either your decision making process, nor analysis of whether it was correct. [/ QUOTE ] 2)Thats not my point. What if i did knew, should i played this hand differently? ... btw i do often take a look at some1s sharkscope in the middle of a hand |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 6.5: river bet of weak villian
It's hard to see what he could be betting that isn't a straight, unless he's bluffing something like AT. His post-flop aggression is so low - he's a trapper, not a better. I think this is a straight at least 90% of the time - he'd probably c/c 2 pair.
Do you know that he's weak or is that an assumption from the stats? If I think I have enough equity to call the river bet (probably not), I call but I'm never ever pushing. I can recover from 500 chips. |
|
|