Thoughts on CCing 2 more in BB with small PP?

[sethypooh21]

Heis, I see what you are saying about capping, and maybe in the 10/20 and up there are Tags who somewhat routinely raise/fold PF (I haven't seen them though). But in most limits covered by this forum, capping with the expectation of folding out is pure spew. 88+ might be a cap for value, but that's a different question. And in the situation where it's a cap for value, the villains are likely aggro enough that playing it for implied odds set value is even better option.

[Heisenb3rg]

Yeah youd want a read of "solid play" to do it. Im assuming the tightness in TAG extends to all aspects of their game. Clearly this isn't always the case.

Yellowjack plays in some fishy games but he also plays 10/20 and 15/30 where im sure there are players that fit that criteria.

"routinetly" raise/folding you make it sound bad or a leak. It's pretty rare for a SB to 3-bet and you to cap AND them having a hand with reverse implied... If SB was 100/100 then clearly buttons range for calling your cap will widen..

EG tons of hands like K9o, A7o, Q9o, are WELL within a TAG's range on the button it's the easiest fold ever to a 3-bet and a cap from anotehr solid player. I think the vast majority of even fairly good players would realize this.

Investing that extra SB for the HUGE advantage knocking a hand like that out (say 15% of his range) when your equity is basically neglicable is SOO worth it imo. Again, im generalizing. Depends on the players.

[sethypooh21]

I don't think I fold q9 after I steal raise and it's two back to me...

[Heisenb3rg]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think I fold q9 after I steal raise and it's two back to me...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah but ur a calling station [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[sethypooh21]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think I fold q9 after I steal raise and it's two back to me...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah but ur a calling station [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

You say that like it's a bad think, bluffbox...