#1
|
|||
|
|||
Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
Am I an idiot, or did I miss the angleshot part?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
even if he did do a fake mistake raise there's nothing wrong with it. also, how the hell can he make it 2800 after gabe bets 1700. did they just cut out a part where he is forced to actually raise to 3400?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
[ QUOTE ]
even if he did do a fake mistake raise there's nothing wrong with it. also, how the hell can he make it 2800 after gabe bets 1700. did they just cut out a part where he is forced to actually raise to 3400? [/ QUOTE ] Must have been 28 more, because after GT calls, the pot size graphic says 10k. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
I suspect Gabe only bet about 1000 and they got the graphic wrong.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
it's party
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
[ QUOTE ]
Am I an idiot, or did I miss the angleshot part? [/ QUOTE ] Nope, I missed it as well. Just more proof that Gabe Thaler is one of the best NLHE cash players around. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
I think Robert raised an additional 2800 on top of Gabe's bet of 1700. Not sure of the angle. Was it a good idea of Gabe to show his cards there?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
Gabe remarked that he didn't know he could do that, as if the bet was an odd amount that shouldn't have been legal. Obviously with his read and his hand he didn't want to make it more expensive for himself, though I am not sure how this is really an angle.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yet another Robert Williamson III angle-shot
What angle shoot?
On a side note, when was that clip filmed? Robert looks terrible and it appears that he is gaining back some of the weight he lost a few years ago. |
|
|