|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: how much gamble | |||
| I don't gamble or gamble very little |
   
|
331 | 73.23% |
| I gamble a lot but at much lower stakes than I play poker |
  
|
70 | 15.49% |
| I gamble at the same stakes that I play poker |
  
|
37 | 8.19% |
| I gamble at higher stakes than I play poker |
  
|
14 | 3.10% |
| Voters: 452. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
07-31-2007, 02:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
RB is the only reason FTP has my business. PS has more players, better game selection and a better stand alone bonus system and better support (I'm told)
If PS had RB it would crush the competition. 
|
|
#32
07-31-2007, 08:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
PS mostly crushes the competition even without rakeback. The only reason I play elsewhere is for the 35% rakeback i'm getting.
|
|
#33
07-31-2007, 05:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] red lion will full tilt let you change affiliate if you want? i dont think so.. [/ QUOTE ] Actually if your affiliate goes rogue, they have been very good about this in the past. [/ QUOTE ] They won't switch me from Reduce the Rake to someone else. [/ QUOTE ]Full Tilt allowed me to switch when my affiliate closed shop, but it took my affiliate emailing them and asking if I could be moved. Most affiliates probably are not willing to do this.
|
|
#34
07-31-2007, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
I like the idea of FPP's plus at the end of the day if you need rake back so bad... you arent a high winning player. Meaning getting involved in to many hands.
|
|
#35
08-01-2007, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
I dont know what kind of rakeback for stars you are talking about. The only thing I can find is some kind of fpp shop.
I rather take money in the pocket rather than stuff in a shop that I may not even want.
|
|
#36
08-01-2007, 05:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
PS does not have RB. Don't let the multitude of PS shills on these forum try and brainwash you otherwise
|
|
#37
08-01-2007, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full tilt vs Pokerstars / affiliate rakeback vs directly rakeback
[ QUOTE ]
I like the idea of FPP's plus at the end of the day if you need rake back so bad... you arent a high winning player. Meaning getting involved in to many hands. [/ QUOTE ] Or we are winning players who arent dumb enough to pass up on a +ev situation. My suspicion would be that as rakeback is undeniably +ev and you arent taking advantage it may be you who isnt the winning player.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
