#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
[ QUOTE ]
It's a very aggressive play. All I'm saying. [/ QUOTE ] Are you asking with results or without, translation: Im very confused. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
You're the only one that knows the results, I deleted them before anyone else could see. (Thanks, by the way)
I'm just looking for what people would put him on given his line. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
[ QUOTE ]
You're the only one that knows the results, I deleted them before anyone else could see. (Thanks, by the way) I'm just looking for what people would put him on given his line. [/ QUOTE ] Stuff I consider very likely: Any Axs, AT+, any two semi connected spades, 88, 99, QQ, JT, 98, 8xss... Stuff I consider somewhat less likely: Straight up bluffs, KQ, QJ, QT, KK |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
Alright, well I've gotta crash so I'm [b]not[b] going to post results.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
Dont post the results yet, let the day regulars comment. At least put it in white.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
Sighaments.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
I'd instantly move in on flop, the spades would scare the crap out of me. Also people are prone to lead out here with big pairs from 10's-K's even with the ace flop, and flat calling sets you up to take a nasty 2-outter on the turn. Moving in still gets you called by AK-A9 generally and eliminates the wide range of threats that your opponent could hold.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
[ QUOTE ]
I'd instantly move in on flop, the spades would scare the crap out of me. Also people are prone to lead out here with big pairs from 10's-K's even with the ace flop, and flat calling sets you up to take a nasty 2-outter on the turn. Moving in still gets you called by AK-A9 generally and eliminates the wide range of threats that your opponent could hold. [/ QUOTE ] Paranoid much? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
I don't play anything like these levels, but I'll pick a range and see how do? I'd say AK, AJ, A10, A9 and A8 at a pinch, Not 88, maybe 99, not KK.
And for me the hand played it'self, for me personally I can't get way from top two pair by the turn especially on the third hand. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand against BCM11
Does he know you are 2+2 on the third hand of play?
I wasn't under the impression that BCM was a wide 3-bettor, but I have never played him, only watched Crounder play him once and read some hands in his blog. I'll post more about what I think later on. |
|
|