#191
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
You were richer than me when it happened.
|
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
yeah but did you raise with it like i did?
|
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
Is the HU tourney idea dead? I'd be down for a small buy-in one on Stars (something like $100).
|
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
It got moved to HSNL and they are talking between $2k - $5k buyin.
I'm all for having a smaller one on stars, would definitely be in. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
I've wrote stars about 5 times so far about getting the private matches set up. They gave my account an option to create my own private sngs, but its not what we want. I asked for deepstack (200-300bb) HU PLO SNGs with no escalating blinds and got a reply of "That structure isn't available, we'll foward it to our ideas department."
I wrote back, twice since then asking what sort of options we have for HU PLO SNGs as far as structure goes. I got pretty heated when they said they'll forward it to the "ideas department" as thats the typical response anyone gets who requests HU cash games. The ideas department seems like an empty office they just pile up requests in. Anyways, I asked to speak to someone from the ideas department or asked for an email address and am waiting on their response. I also asked why they could create the "special HU matches" being used in the HSNL HU MTT but can't transfer that same exact sturcture over to a HU PLO match. This is very frustrating. Ok, rant over. |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
Well, if we were going to do our own small buy-in tourney, I don't think we'd need that kind of structure anyway. I think something like 100bb with no escalating blinds or even the typical structure best 2 out of 3 would be plenty.
Also, I'd think that the reason that Stars doesn't want to have deep stack HU with no escalating blinds like that is that it would cut way down on the people who like to play cash games HU (since there would be lower rake) and might make it harder to get games started since a lot of tables end up starting because people try to play HU and then others leech on as soon as someone else joins. |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
I felt like taking a shot at PLO500 and ran at -182.56 ptbb over 25 hands lol (managed to lose 3 60/40 flops all with me having the 60% end) [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
|
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
I lie, I thought you had $500 when you were dealt quad deuces [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
No I didn't raise it, although I did post to my livejournal about how ashamed I was that I didn't raise. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
I also lie....i didn't raise it either [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
I, too, am ashamed. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **** JULY LOW CONENT THREAD ****
Has there been any thoughts about doing this through straight cash on FTP? If the match doesn't last too long the rake shouldn't be too much of a killer. I guess someone would have to keep track of all the matches or post results here.
I'm new here but would love to play something like this. |
|
|