Documented encouraging sports stories

[psuasskicker]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
good call on lance, 'it's not about the bike' is a realllllly good book.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really don't know if you want one of the greatest fraudes in history to be a rollmodel for your kid.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have found the mysterious proof that Lance was doping? I can't wait to see it!

- C -

[Alamo]

Big lol at everybody being naive enough to believe that cycling is not FUBAR, and yes, that includes the guys actually sitting on the bikes.

[vozzie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
good call on lance, 'it's not about the bike' is a realllllly good book.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really don't know if you want one of the greatest fraudes in history to be a rollmodel for your kid.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have found the mysterious proof that Lance was doping? I can't wait to see it!

- C -

[/ QUOTE ]

There is proof and it can hardly be called misterious. In 1999 there was no way to find EPO. Five years later they tested some of his bloodsamples from that tour. In 6 of them they found EPO but he couldn't be punished because they couldn't perform a contra expertise because there are no B samples.

So, let's cut the crap shall we?

[XXXNoahXXX]

[ QUOTE ]
I really don't know if you want one of the greatest fraudes in history to be a rollmodel for your kid.

If you want a real story of perseverance than you should read the story of Marc Herremans.

The guy ended up in 6th place at his first iron man in Hawai back in 2001. In 2002 he got parilized from the chest down. In 2006 he won the iron main in his wheelchair...

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]
There is proof and it can hardly be called misterious. In 1999 there was no way to find EPO. Five years later they tested some of his bloodsamples from that tour. In 6 of them they found EPO but he couldn't be punished because they couldn't perform a contra expertise because there are no B samples.

So, let's cut the crap shall we?

[/ QUOTE ]


please tell me english is not your first language.

no matter what evidence your provide, it is hard to trust someone who cannot spell.

[vozzie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really don't know if you want one of the greatest fraudes in history to be a rollmodel for your kid.

If you want a real story of perseverance than you should read the story of Marc Herremans.

The guy ended up in 6th place at his first iron man in Hawai back in 2001. In 2002 he got parilized from the chest down. In 2006 he won the iron main in his wheelchair...

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]
There is proof and it can hardly be called misterious. In 1999 there was no way to find EPO. Five years later they tested some of his bloodsamples from that tour. In 6 of them they found EPO but he couldn't be punished because they couldn't perform a contra expertise because there are no B samples.

So, let's cut the crap shall we?

[/ QUOTE ]


please tell me english is not your first language.

no matter what evidence your provide, it is hard to trust someone who cannot spell.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it's not. I can spell my first language just fine. I am sorry that my English doesn't meet your expectations. Your third language is probably a lot better.

[psuasskicker]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
good call on lance, 'it's not about the bike' is a realllllly good book.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really don't know if you want one of the greatest fraudes in history to be a rollmodel for your kid.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have found the mysterious proof that Lance was doping? I can't wait to see it!

- C -

[/ QUOTE ]

There is proof and it can hardly be called misterious. In 1999 there was no way to find EPO. Five years later they tested some of his bloodsamples from that tour. In 6 of them they found EPO but he couldn't be punished because they couldn't perform a contra expertise because there are no B samples.

So, let's cut the crap shall we?

[/ QUOTE ]

You talk a good game but your "evidence" is sorely lacking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Armstrong
Throughout his career only one test showed indications of the presence of doping products: in 1999, a urine sample showed traces of corticosteroids, but the amount was not in the positive test range. He later produced a medical certificate showing he used an approved cream for saddle sores which contained the substance.

- C -

[vozzie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
good call on lance, 'it's not about the bike' is a realllllly good book.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really don't know if you want one of the greatest fraudes in history to be a rollmodel for your kid.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have found the mysterious proof that Lance was doping? I can't wait to see it!

- C -

[/ QUOTE ]

There is proof and it can hardly be called misterious. In 1999 there was no way to find EPO. Five years later they tested some of his bloodsamples from that tour. In 6 of them they found EPO but he couldn't be punished because they couldn't perform a contra expertise because there are no B samples.

So, let's cut the crap shall we?

[/ QUOTE ]

You talk a good game but your "evidence" is sorely lacking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Armstrong
Throughout his career only one test showed indications of the presence of doping products: in 1999, a urine sample showed traces of corticosteroids, but the amount was not in the positive test range. He later produced a medical certificate showing he used an approved cream for saddle sores which contained the substance.

- C -

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...g05/aug23news3

It's not about corticosteroids, one of the doping products he "legaly" took. It's about the EPO that was found in his blood. (6 times!)

[BuckyK]

So the guy wins the tour 7 times, and there is unsubstantial evidence toward him using EPO in 1999. How the hell did he manage to win the Tour 5 more times after that and not test positive?

[Cornell Fiji]

Lol at how naive the Lance defenders are. Barroid has never tested positive either, is he clean?

Autistic 3 point baller

[Gunnarr]

Look up Terry Fox on Google or whatever