Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2007, 10:52 PM
Warren Harding Warren Harding is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 1,130
Default 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

First orbit, no reads. Effective stacks: 80 bb

Two folds to me, I raise KQo to 4x bb. HJ, BN and BB call

Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

BB leads for 2/3 pot, I ...

a) Fold-- Betting into a field this size including a PFR is strong. The board is mostly uncoordinated, so I'm likely against at least top pair with two more players to act.
b) Call-- There is insufficient evidence that I am behind. I can still likely get to showdown cheaply if I want, or easily fold to a raise behind me or fold the turn to significant strength. I can read the hand more easily on the turn. Calling is better than raising because raising will disproportionately fold out worse hands correctly, while I hate raising and planning to fold to a reraise.
c) Raise-- I have a vulnerable hand that is still better than BB's range. Fold out hands like A8, and milk 97s or KT. Easy fold to a RR. I can manage the pot better if I have control.

Each option works for various opponents, but against unknowns? In this situation I mostly favor (b) then (c) then (a). I call, planning to bet the turn if checked to, call if HU and the lead is reasonable, fold if the lead is 2/3 pot and there is another player behind me. The borderline cases are 1/2 pot lead with another player behind me and 2/3 pot lead HU, in both cases leaning slightly toward fold.

How is my thinking? Any flaws large or small?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2007, 03:30 AM
DiamondDog DiamondDog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 202
Default Re: 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

I'm a noob when it comes to NL so go easy on me.

FWIW, I'm thinking if BB has Aces, Kings or AK you're in trouble. But if he does I would have expected an unknown to reraise pre-flop.

If he's hit a set I might expect an unknown to check and reel me in later.

I'm tempted to raise/fold.

I repeat, I'm a noob.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-31-2007, 08:59 AM
MarcusT MarcusT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 146
Default Re: 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

That's why you fold KQo OOP preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2007, 10:17 AM
CaptVimes CaptVimes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Embracing Distractions
Posts: 992
Default Re: 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

[ QUOTE ]
That's why you fold KQo OOP preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

You really fold KQ from MP PF?

My thoughts,

Raising - Will hopefully get us heads up. It also gives us the oppotunity to take control. Meaning if checked to us on the turn we can choose to bet again or check behind. Any other callers, other than the turn raiser and I'm pretty much done here. If the BB reraises I'm done. A proper raise, however, is going to get you somewhat committed to this pot with marginal hand that may be behind already.

Folding - The pot is big already given the PF action. One or more of the villains could be set mining. I don't know what the donk by BB means. What's a bigger mistake in this situation, getting involved in big pot with TPGK, or folding maybe the best hand when you only have 4BB invested.

Calling - Your enlarging the pot and gaining no useful information. You are also, as I said earlier, giving HJ and BTN better odds to call (>3to1) if they are playing a draw. (Very unlikely here given dry nature of the flop.) What's your plan with this on the turn? If BB bets 2/3 again on the turn he's got a half pot bet left to go all in on the river(assuming 80 bb stacks and HJ and BTN Fold).

Some hands are, I think, better won now rather than trying to get every ounce of value out of worse hands. This seems to be one of those hands especially since we are OOP. I think I favor raising>folding>calling
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-31-2007, 11:14 AM
MarcusT MarcusT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 146
Default Re: 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
That's why you fold KQo OOP preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

You really fold KQ from MP PF?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes. Do you see the difference of playing this very hand from the button?

But, tbh, I play KQs OOP, but I don't get happy with TPGK.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-31-2007, 11:16 AM
subzero subzero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stars 100NL
Posts: 957
Default Re: 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

[ QUOTE ]
a) Fold-- Betting into a field this size including a PFR is strong.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not ready to accept this from an unknown 25NL player.

I don't like raising because it bloats the pot when all we have is TPGK. If the board was more coordinated, then I'd lean towards raising. I like calling here. I think it's likely that HJ and BN missed and will fold. Then we can play position against BB and see what happens on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-31-2007, 11:30 AM
mce86 mce86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,140
Default Re: 25 NL Basic top pair OOP logic

First off, you dont want to fold out those hands you are ahead of, you want to charge them to see the next card.
Your thoughts seem fine. Im just calling here...I have two players behind me who called a raise, so they could be strong as well. Turn will have to be revaluated.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.