Whitelime vs. HEK starting 1:25 EST!!!!!!!!!

[jsnipes28]

[ QUOTE ]
i don't see how making a -ev play is going to help his being a dog in the match

[/ QUOTE ]

ya, are u serious?

[TheWorstPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
then you are retarded?


[/ QUOTE ]
Hahahahahahahahaha

[KRANTZ]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
then you are retarded?


[/ QUOTE ]
Hahahahahahahahaha

[/ QUOTE ]

[mythrilfox]

i just mean that if you say whitelime is too strong of an opponent and willingly take a spot that you can positively identify as -EV, then you are just giving up. the reason you're a dog against him is because he manipulates you into making -EV decisions, so why would you knowingly take a situation with the worst of it?

even if whitelime's future edge was completely insurmountable, i don't see how it would be big enough to justify going in here... he's only getting 1.66-1 on his money if my math is correct, which seems like it would be giving up way too much immediate equity, no?

edit: where is all this laughter directed at

[jsnipes28]

[ QUOTE ]

edit: where is all this laughter directed at

[/ QUOTE ]

the laughter is directed at you, in case you were wondering.

here's a very basic explanation. let's say HEK thinks whitelime wins 2/3 games 60% of the time, but thinks that if he (HEK) can win the first game he can win one of the next to 60% of the time. You see how it would then be correct for HEK to gamble when he likely has at least 40ish% equity, right?

[BottomSet68]

Who won? Good match?

[swityak11]

[ QUOTE ]
Who won? Good match?

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
in case u guys missed it, i win 2-0. - HEK

[/ QUOTE ]

[etizzle]

[ QUOTE ]
Who won? Good match?

[/ QUOTE ]

someone ban this guy please

[king_of_drafts]

and I lose another side bet

This is getting expensive fast

[BobboFitos]

[ QUOTE ]
so so standard

[/ QUOTE ]

ppl who say this is a spew are flatout wrong. it's a fine play