#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I recall the horse porn being posted. The video involved an "actor" called Mr. Hands I think. Don't ask how I remember this. I believe it had to do with a story of a man dying from having sex with a horse in washington, but it turned out the video was a fake and was just "mr hands" and one of his videos. [/ QUOTE ] no it was very real and the guy ended up very dead [/ QUOTE ] yeah i thought it was real too, and i def wouldnt consider it porn...i thought it was more of a darwin award type thing. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
elaine did it with a horse?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
I thought last time this was discussed someone did some research on beastforums and discovered that the man who made the mrhands video was sill making new videos and wasn't the man who died. I could be wrong on this though, as I don't exactly consider myself a beasty expert.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
Video was definitely posted. When can we expect the AIM transcripts of the discussion of both Elaine's blog AND this thread?
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
Ah, the Yoko Ono of twoplustwo.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
haha she's so stupid - nothing amuses me more than meaningless self-righetousness.
i think the site should cater to 30 something feminists |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
Can you own horses? Because that horse definitely owned that man.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
I find Elaine's adamant hostility towards people who refer to her by her husband's name to be very interesting. Technically of course Miller is not her name, but to call her 'Mrs. Miller' hardly seems like the sort of thing that would provoke more than, at most, a simple, cheerful correction. Why does this perfectly harmless social convention make her so angry?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
Haha, the Amazon review is great -- a shameless jump at a chance to plug her hubby's books piled on top of admitting she hadn't read the book herself, with 1 out of 48 people finding her review helpful. And now she has posted on her blog about the "hate" she has gotten for her "review."
I don't recall the horse porn thing but nobody can read everything. I'm pretty sure if even a forum addict as severe as myself didn't see it then or see it talked about in all the time since Elaine left, its importance was then and is definitely now at best miniscule and indicative of pretty much nothing about 2+2. I was reading frequently when Elaine left, and people were on her for being ridiculously argumentative, making silly statements and poor arguments, and taking some extreme positions, in an often very self-righteous manner, on minor matters. Her now saying this was all over some horse porn that I and I bet most people at the time never even heard of seems extremely disingenuous and self-serving. As is, ridiculously so, her blog's new "explanation" of why she made such a bad, transparently shilling non-review of someone's poker book. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)
It is such crap that she makes that video her top reason for leaving and taking Ed with her.
She was/is a complete tool and went out of her way to stir it up at every opportunity. I hope it's worth it, Ed....I really do. Seeing guys get Yoko'd is sad. |
|
|